Recently, I
brought up a concern at a city council meeting. While attempting to address my concern, the city manager discussed some
negative allegations about me. While not exactly pertinent to the issue at hand, whether or not the city of Lewisville was doing everything it could to avoid hiring illegal aliens, I understand why the city manager brought them up. The allegations were, of course, false, and I would have been more than happy to debunk them. As I attempted to respond, the mayor interrupted, informing me that, "We didn't ask for you to respond." He was absolutely correct. I hadn't been asked, and I would not be asked to respond.
While campaigning, the mayor would often say that he always took the time to listen to citizens. He dismissed the
examples I brought up of citizens who felt they were treated rudely at city council meetings, suggesting that they must have faulty memories. In the June 2009 edition of The Lewisville Horizon newsletter, the mayor said, "It is important for the city to make it as easy as possible for you to communicate back to us, because the most useful communication does flow both directions." I suspect that what the mayor says will very rarely look like what he actually does, but I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt.
With that said, I have a few questions. Is this the way citizens can expect to be treated at city council meetings? If, for whatever reasons, allegations against a citizen are discussed in that public setting, where those in attendance, as well as those watching on television or online can see, do you intend to deny the citizen an opportunity to respond, as you did in my case? You do understand that without a response, viewers are likely to assume that the allegations are true? If you feel that it would be wrong to put a citizen in a position like this, what will you do to make sure this doesn't happen in the future? Why did you fail to do so at the last city council meeting?
I ask these questions because, while I'm willing to indulge the mayor in what appears to be a power trip, I'm not willing to allow other citizens to be treated in a similar manner.
Your timely response is appreciated.
Mr. Edmondson,
Thank you for your recent email concerning communications at City Council meetings. It is always good to hear from our citizens about their concerns.
With my 3 years on council, I have always seen respect given to both the Council and the person at the podium voicing their concerns. I expect that the respect will continue in the future. The Mayor is charged with presiding at the Council meetings by charter and will continue to do so.
Thank you,
David Thornhill